A password will be e-mailed to you.

BYT is recapping Girls Season Three for your reading pleasure. Rather than a straight review, we’re doing it “he said/she said” style with recappers Svetlana Legetic and Alan Zilberman. They will both feel a lot of feelings, and A LOT of those feelings will be disparate. Enjoy!

CHECK OUT EPISODE 1 + 2 RECAP HERE and EPISODE 3 HERE

Alan: Well, Hannah is a complete fucking sociopath. I’m not parsing words here: Dunham calls her fourth episode “Dead Inside,” and that’s an imperfect description of Hannah’s mental state. Aside from astonishing narcissism, she’s empty inside, a husk of a human who lacks any sense of empathy. It would be unsurprising if Hannah transitions to Dexter by the time the season is over, and I’m impressed Dunham unearths her protagonist’s inherent ugliness.

“Dead Inside” begins with Hannah waiting for a meeting with her editor David (John Cameron Mitchell). Something strange is happening around the office, and Hannah figures it out slowly: David is dead. Her first reaction is, strangely, annoyance. She wants to know what this means for her e-book. The rest of the episode is a series of Hannah’s cool reflections on David’s death, and how they astonish others. It surprises Adam that Hannah does not stop to think about the loss of human life. Ray (correctly) remarks that he’s taking the news harder than Hannah despite the fact that Ray’s only memory of David ends with assault.

There is a lot to unpack here, whether it’s the show’s purpose or how it strikes an uneasy balance between comedy and horror. But first I want to talk about the episode’s funniest scene, where Adam and Hannah debate the merits of Gawker. Hannah reads an insensitive Gawker post about David’s death breathlessly, while Adam is quick to point out how their writers are scum. It’s an interesting argument, especially since Gawker has been overtly critical of Girls’ nepotism and, for all intents and purposes, Adam is the show’s moral center. What do you think of the Gawker scene, Svetlana? Is Dunham speaking directly to John Cook and the others, or would Hannah merely be obsessed with the gossip site just because? How should we take this scene in light of the recent Dunham/Vogue controversy on Jezebel?

Girls-Season-3-Episode-2-Hannah

Svetlana:  Well, I for one, find the episode both hilarious and (surprisingly?) courageous on Dunham’s part. Not too many people would take the risk of ongoingly making themselves the least likable character on their own show, and she well, she seems to thrive on it. But that’s not all.

No matter how you look at it, Girls is a show about very selfish and pretty unlikable people and this episode is sort of a let-your-selfishness-and-unlikability-freak-flag-fly pinnacle of it all.
Between Hannah’s inability to react properly to the big picture of the situation, the use of Gawker (who, if you remember, had a BIG BLOW OUT with Dunham about publishing her book proposal without her knowledge, so there’s all sorts of layers of potential vengeance there to parse through), this is as an example of how quickly a death stops being about death and simply becomes click bait in today’s day and age (obviously, the times of thoughtful obituaries are long gone in 2014). It is almost a laundry list of just how fucked up society is right now.The episode was obviously written, shot, and made several months before the Jezebel controversy but that fact should just serve as an example that this kind of stuff and insensitivity is commonplace now. If this episode was airing 3 months from now, I am sure there would be a very recent media insensitivity towards Dunham we could try and tie it to then, too.

In 2000teens there is no real empathy out there, no actual connections between people, no nothing. Just deadness inside. And in some ways, at least Hannah is not afraid to admit to it, instead of simply posturing her way through grief. She is a sociopath, yes, but she is a sociopath that lets you know she’s one. Which makes her way less dangerous to society than those sociopaths lurking everywhere else in this show (at least in my book).

And I feel it is not Adam, but maybe Laird and Caroline who are emerging here as Hannah’s Jimminy Crickets of sorts?

Screen Shot 2014-01-26 at 6.51.26 PM

Alan: So there’s this splashy montage where Hannah, along with Caroline and Laird, prance through a cemetery. Personally, I found the whole thing deeply disturbing. A cemetery is a place for solemnity, for me anyway, I wouldn’t dance through one like I’m an asshole. There’s even a scene where the three of them accidentally interrupt a funeral service, which to me felt like an admonishment of their behavior. I guess I can understand high school students being this cavalier, but to me Hannah et. al felt like assholes. Maybe I’m wrong?

The funeral montage ends with probably the most important scene of the episode: Caroline tells a story about Adam and death. It’s meant to move Hannah – she feels nothing, obviously – and Caroline sees right through Hannah after Caroline admits it’s a lie. The scene doesn’t exactly work for me: Caroline’s story felt so contrived I couldn’t quite believe it, but at least it sets up the most reveal in this dense half hour. And Laird’s reaction to Caroline’s story – he’s moved to tears – is a queasy combination of sympathy and naivete. Returning to Adam, Hannah steals Caroline’s story so that Adam can think she’s a complete person.

This is where the show veers into Dexter territory: Hannah realizes she’s missing an essential part of her humanity, so she borrows an anecdote in order to pretend. It’s all the more fucked up that it’s a fake story she heard from Adam’s sister. Svetlana, you say there’s no empathy out there in this decade, and I hope you’re not right. Can you elaborate a bit? Do you think Dunham is eviscerating this character in particular, or is she making a broader point about our Gawker-obsessed generation?

Svetlana: I do agree that the cemetery prancing scene (great choice of word there, btw Alan, “prance” – because that is EXACTLY what they do) is meant to be the third-to-final nail in Hannah’s sociopathy coin. It IS meant to sort of make you shudder. And then the story scene, while so obviously fake to you or me or other humans with souls, is the second-to-final nail: all Hannah knows at this point is that she is supposed to react to stuff like this but she can’t even register if something is obviously a fake emotion or not, not even in others. When she takes the story to Adam, we really do know the final nail is there: Hannah is truly, legitimately dead inside. So while all three scenes are completely shudderworthy to a viewer/bystander – they feel sort of necessary and sort of necessary in that sequence. We already felt uncomfortable with the front load of Hannah simply being unable to mourn, now it is taken to almost Monty Python (or Dexter) levels macabre.

As for that final question, I do too, Alan hope that that statement is not right. I, personally, do think empathy is still around, maybe just not quite as alive and well as it used to be, and internet has played a huge role in the general desentization of our humanity. It turned things to think and feel about into things to simply email around or share on social media, and as such, in potentially real grieving scenarios, some of the youth of today simply doesn’t know what to do with themselves. So they go prancing through cemeteries in hopes of making themselves feel something (or something to that effect).

Overall, a powerful episode, and as I mentioned, my favorite one of the season thus far, maybe because it DID make me feel uncomfortable. A lot of people have mentioned with Neil LaBute’s latest movie Some Girl(s) that he lost a little bit of his mysanthopy edge, and this episode evoked in me some of those previously LaBute reserved shudderring at humanity. So, well done Lena (?)

Alan: I’m so glad you bring up LaBute, Svetlana, since he and Dunham feel like kindred spirits, sorta. They’re both interested in privilege, as well as hollow people, and there are moments in this episode that made me think of Your Friends and Neighbors. Hannah’s a husk of a person, and perhaps she’s a product of her culture. The more likely scenario, to me anyway, is that she’s always been this way and the world of narcissistic Brooklyn brings out her true colors in this specific way.

I was so hopeful for Hannah and Adam in the first few episodes. They seemed to function, sorta. Now I hope Adam figures Hannah out before it’s too late. Caroline could warn him, maybe, but I doubt he’d listen.
Screen Shot 2014-01-26 at 6.45.35 PM
X
X